
Today, I am looking into the further evidence of the Azimi la Umoja – One Kenya Alliance petition, which is to make the 9th August 2022 Presidential Election “null and void”. They are doing what they can and with their evidence to prove the conspiracy and the rigging of the 2022 election. That is the gist of it.
This is why this affidavit is a part of what the legal team of Azimio had prepared. His an expert and a testimony proving the alleged criminal conspiracy to “steal” and “rig” the election. We know that the gentlemen in question has been a whistleblower before and has a reputation of truth-telling. He had to flee into exile, because of what he did in the past. Therefore, his name is important here. His not a nobody and an unknown person in the Republic.
That’s why this affidavit is special, but he will be questioned in the Supreme Court and have to come with facts to prove what he alleged went on. Because, what he did say in it has to be tested and proven.
The first part of the affidavit is about a young fellow, a nameless man claiming there was a team of 56 people and had 10 supervisors who was assessing, entering and manipulating the entries of the 34A’s. They were sent a “Uchaguzi Tallying” or “Uchaguzi 2022” where they were edited before they were published on the IEBC Portal. The young man than claimed they configured the 34A’s from JPEG to PDF before uploading them to the IEBC Portal. Some of the claimed supervisors was Davis Chirchir. Dennis Itumbi, Kibyegon, Morris Mutegi. Baby Serge and Jackson Kandi. In additional to all of that, the young man also stated that the data from KIEMS Kits was sent first to the “Uchaguzi 2022”, then it was edited before it was published on the IEBC Portal.
What is striking is that the nameless person all this detail, but kept himself anonymous. His willing to testify in Court. Githongo claims he has this all on tape. That tape with altered voice and lack of face recognition might be counted as evidence.
However, this could also be deemed hearsay. As there are only talk from one man. It is hard to know, if this is the truth. That’s why it’s natural to question it. This is really using the servers and the hidden data narrative, which is very familiar with the questionable serves in 2017. When the algorithms decided it all in the end.
I would have expected more data and more computer wizardry from the expected witness and man who delivered evidence from the inside. The affidavit doesn’t show it. So, until proven otherwise. It can be stated as hearsay. Yes, I haven’t seen the tape. Yes, I don’t know if the man or young man is credible even. He could be anybody for all I know. Even if Githongo was able to trace him and speak to him after the election on the 9th August 2022. This conversation went down on the 18th August, three days after the declared results on the 15th August 2022. That would mean it would all be fresh in the memory of the young man.
The reason I question it’s validity and such. Is that this isn’t the game-changer or the proof, which is needed. This puts dubious claims on the election, which the petition itself also states. However, will this stand in court or be deemed as “hearsay”. Because, there got to be more than this.
When I heard Githongo’s name and an affidavit. I would think it would be explosive and leak unique details from whistleblowers from within. Who had files, proof of malpractice and rigging. However, here is just talks and a tape. That has to be tested in the Supreme Court. So, now it depends the judges if they deem this fit or not. Peace.


















