
RDC: Mouvement du 23 Mars (M23) – Communique Officiel du Mouvement du 1 Juin (01.09.2023)












In London these days, it should be issued a warning, especially if you come across the Conservative Party or the Tories. They are the ones that doesn’t accept dissent or want any pushback on their horrible legislation or policies. In this regard, the Court of Appeal has justified to block the entry of asylum-seekers seeking refuge in the United Kingdom in the Third Country (Rwanda).
Kigali must feel the pushback too. They are the ones in question. While London should take the blame. They are the ones who has issued this protocol and planned this affair. While doling away money on the gravy-train that gives the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) needed legitimacy. They are getting relevant and also useful to the Imperial British. That’s what is so conning here. This isn’t a sponsorship deal like the ones with Arsenal Football Club. No, this is the real deal and a gem of an arrangement for a tyrant like Paul Kagame. His getting the bag and getting London to fight his cause. All for the sorry souls and the unfortunate asylum-seekers who happened to get on the shores or cross into the United Kingdom.
Just read these here… before I continue…
“UNHCR notes that whilst Rwanda has generously provided safe haven to refugees for decades and has made efforts to build the capacity of its asylum system, its national asylum system is still nascent. In UNHCR’s assessment, there is a serious risk that the burden of processing the asylum claims of new arrivals from the UK could further overstretch the capacity of the Rwandan national asylum system, thereby undermining its ability to provide protection for all those who seek asylum. In comparison, the UK national asylum system is highly developed and well capacitated to consider asylum claims” (UNHCR, 08.06.2023).
“For the reasons given above, I believe that the evidence before the Divisional Court established that there were substantial grounds to believe that asylum-seekers relocated to Rwanda under the MEDP were at real risk of refoulement, and that accordingly such relocation would constitute a breach of article 3 of the ECHR and contravene section 6 of the 1998 Act” ([2023] EWCA Civ 745, 29.06.2023).
When you have read those… you see what the UNHCR and the Court of Appeals settled down with. There are reasons for questions and it’s honestly righteous at that. This isn’t even looking into the human rights violations, the oppressive regime or any of the “governance” of government of Rwanda. No, this is just the mere spectrum of how it’s operating at the current time with its own Asylum system.
“Those removed will arrive at Kigali and be accommodated at the Hope Hostel where they will be free to come and go. That has a capacity of 100. The evidence describes plans for further sites to be identified. According to the reception and accommodation Note Verbale they will be provided with mobile telephones with internet access. They will be given a temporary residence permit for three months on arrival. That will be extended if the asylum claim is not completed within three months. Those removed to Rwanda will be provided with financial support by the British Government in Rwanda at the same level they would receive in the United Kingdom during the asylum process, and thereafter, for a total of five years if granted asylum and up to three years if not. Those who make an asylum claim will be interviewed by the Directorate General of Immigration and Emigration (“DGIE”). The asylum claim would then be considered by the Refugee Status Determination Committee (“RSDC”). If the claim is refused there is a right of appeal to the relevant ministry (“MINEMA”). If that appeal fails, there is a further right of appeal to the High Court and from there to the Appeal Court. Only on the hypothesis that an asylum claim has failed at all four stages will the question of removal arise” ([2023] EWCA Civ 745, 29.06.2023).
When reading these things… it should infuriate you. Because this is what the Tories are willing to do and how it conducts its affairs. Alas… the Home Secretary will come bombastic with her own retort on the matter.
It’s, therefore, rich that Braverman said this yesterday…
“Importantly, Rwanda is a country where the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees itself operates an emergency transit scheme for migrants from Libya, and with which we have a robust agreement to protect asylum seekers from risk of harm. That first relocation flight was, unfortunately, frustrated by last-minute measures from the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, which has had the effect of pausing flights while our domestic legal proceedings are ongoing” (Braverman, 29.06.2023).
When reading that statement from the Home Secretary after reading the verdict or the judgement. A man can only get so flabbergasted. It is the nerve and the manner of which she states things. It is really over the top and she should reconsider. However, she has dug herself into it and is willing to bury herself alive. Just so she can apprehend and banish people from the shores of the United Kingdom. That’s all she wants to do, and she doesn’t consider the implications of it. The risk and the lives at stake. No, it is all just a mere front to get rid of one “enemy” and one kind of people who dares to come to the United Kingdom. They should never even think of it.
This is just sad, tragic and hopeless. The Tories are so vile and has such little grasp of humanity. As they are targeting the weakest, the ones fleeing wars and the ones who is in the need of shelter. That’s who the Tories are after, and they intend to send them to Kigali… just so they are nowhere near London. Peace.