“First Lady Mama Rachel Ruto has said her team will be going across the country for prayers. Rachel said the mission dubbed Faith Diplomacy, will ensure every corner of the country experiences the prayers” (The Star Kenya, 05.03.2023).
I don’t know about you, but the First Lady Rachel Ruto is getting a prominent role. There is reports that she is getting a team of 100 people working on the clock for her “Faith Diplomacy”. We don’t know what that is, but we know she plans to schedule prayers across the nation and such.
The First Lady is going all spiritual and we know the Kenya Kwanza Alliance (KKA) used the churches and their connection to the religion to gain voters. That was a choice and the Deputy President knew the audience he was catering too.
When she decides to this… she should study the scripture herself.
I feel the letter of James has a vital point, which has to be brought home:
“14 What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone claims to have faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save them? 15 Suppose a brother or a sister is without clothes and daily food. 16 If one of you says to them, “Go in peace; keep warm and well fed,” but does nothing about their physical needs, what good is it? 17 In the same way, faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead” – James 2.14-17, New International Version (NIV).
Especially, since she is bringing to the table a new definition and a new for of diplomacy. It is fine to pray, “thoughts and prayers” has a place. Nevertheless, it is worthless without actions. Faith is dead without actions. That is not my words, but the scripture itself.
This is why Rachel Ruto shouldn’t only launch prayers and have a team to promote faith. The “Prayers” are directly worthless if there is no actions to back it up. If she wants to be portrayed as holier than thou. It works for her image and publicity, but not following scripture herself. That is really ironic when she is launching a faith based entity.
Diplomacy is usually about dialogue and settlement. It is about two parties finding measures and resolves grievances. It is either between nations, groups or political parties who will work towards one common goal or agreement, which will be negotiated and create framework between them. Therefore, I don’t know how faith coincides with this, but surely it has been used in the past. Though not promoted in the manner of which the First Lady does.
The First Lady should explain it and tell how it operates. Because, “faith” + “diplomacy” is very vague terms in some sense. It can mean so much and so little at the same time. She can nearly do whatever she wants. It can easily become a grift… and used a means to an end. That’s up to her and she can be a pastorpreneur in the State House.
Time will tell what she really will do, but the “faith diplomacy” itself seems like a weird proposition. Since it is made up and I don’t know what it is supposed to achieve even. It isn’t anything wrong in particular in prayers. Neither is there anything wrong in having faith. However, faith is dead without action… and the First Lady needs to know this.
Faith Diplomacy based on prayers alone isn’t even following the scriptures itself. She is doing the prayers, but not doing any action. There is no diplomacy or diplomatic mission in itself. Unless, she feels the activity of prayers is keeping herself busy. That is really sad and tragic misuse of state funds, but not a shocking wastage of it. Just misusing funds for holy moments, instead of serving the communities and government services. That is inaction and not serving the citizens.
In Matthew this is said:
“17 Tell us then, what is your opinion? Is it right to pay the imperial tax[a] to Caesar or not?”
18 But Jesus, knowing their evil intent, said, “You hypocrites, why are you trying to trap me? 19 Show me the coin used for paying the tax.” They brought him a denarius, 20 and he asked them, “Whose image is this? And whose inscription?”
21 “Caesar’s,” they replied.
Then he said to them, “So give back to Caesar what is Caesar’s, and to God what is God’s.”” (Matthew 22, 17-21, New International Version).
Why I am ending with this?
Because of a vital point. Jesus is telling that you should separate what is the “world” and what is “god’s” which is seemingly very transparent here. While the First Lady is mixing these two worlds. Both the spiritual in connection to god and the ones involving Caesar’s. She should be careful doing so, as she is eating of the “imperial tax” and not serving the Lord directly. The First Lady is married to a “Caesar” of our time, as his the former Deputy President and now President.
She should act and not only pray. Secondly, be worried about the mix-up of the church and “Caesar” in the State House. The First Lady is mixing them together and I wonder if she can mend them together. However, if she does… she didn’t understand the story of the “imperial tax” and also forgot that faith is pointless without actions.
The First Lady can pray… no one will stop her from doing. No one should stop her from doing so. Nevertheless, I wonder what she will do and if she will “give back to Caesar’s what is Caesar’s”. Time will tell… Peace.