
“I am afraid to say—and I will come to a close soon—that that is why it was a central purpose of the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, now an Act, to properly empower the police in face of the protests, yet Opposition Members voted against it. Had Opposition Members in the other place not blocked these measures when they were in the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, the police would have already had many of the powers in this Bill and the British people would not have been put through this grief. Yes, I am afraid that it is the Labour party, the Lib Dems, the coalition of chaos, the Guardian-reading, tofu-eating wokerati and, dare I say, the anti-growth coalition that we have to thank for the disruption we are seeing on our roads today. I urge Opposition MPs and Members of the other place to take this second chance, do the right thing, respect the rights of the law-abiding majority and support this Bill” – Suella Braverman MP (18.10.2022).
The one to take over the Office of Priti Patel MP is Suella Braveman MP, the newest edition of the Home Secretary. Just like the predecessor, there is a little flinch of arrogance and entitlement over her stay. She hasn’t even been in office long or been able to make a difference yet. However, she acts like her boss and continues the pledge of a “coalition of chaos” and says the opposition is disruptive.
Braverman MP is forgetting one vital factor here. The “coalition of chaos” is currently the government, which she resides. It isn’t the opposition or anyone else who is causing damage, plights or financial instability. That’s all done by her fellow peers and the ones the Prime Minister has appointed since September.
For a short stint and within no time. It’s the Tories who has damaged and created a mayhem. The Labour party or the Liberal Democrats haven’t done jack. They have only called out the Tories for the damage they have caused. The affects of their policies and the “mini-budget”. It isn’t like the Home Office, or the Home Secretary has any remedies. Only wants to stifle the rights to demonstrate and be vigilant to a proposed bill, which will only limit the rights of anyone opposing the government. That’s what it is and who wouldn’t?
I don’t know what Tofu, the Guardian and Woke thinking has about this. They are just sloganeering, which could have been made by political student. It just reflects how badly the MP is defending the cause or the bill itself. When she is using arguments like this and cannot even try to find well established reasons or proof to begin with.
What does it matter what people eat? Is everyone just supposed to eat beef or meat? Tofu isn’t “food” or is that only food for thought. Well, we can also wonder, if she reads only The Telegraph or Daily Mail. Since, she has such a hatred for The Guardian. However, that shouldn’t matter too. She can enjoy the gutter-press, if she wants too. That’s her business, but she surely should find better arguments than this.
Lastely, what is the “wokerati”? We know what she trying to do with people who are “woke”? But the way she defends herself, isn’t she a “snow-flake”? Just by the way she is addressing things. It isn’t wise or calculated, more out of desperation and trying to malign the opposition. Which isn’t even done cleverly, but without any sort of reason. It is amazing how foolish this is.
Braverman MP is officially in a league of her own. Peace.















